I have defined an interface in C++, i.e. a class containing only pure virtual functions.
I want to explicitly forbid users of the interface to delete the object through a pointer to the interface, so I declared a protected and non-virtual destructor for the interface, something like:
class ITest{
public:
virtual void doSomething() = 0;
protected:
~ITest(){}
};
void someFunction(ITest * test){
test->doSomething(); // ok
// deleting object is not allowed
// delete test;
}
The GNU compiler gives me a warning saying:
class 'ITest' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
Once the destructor is protected, what is the difference in having it virtual or non-virtual?
Do you think this warning can be safely ignored or silenced?
JavaScript questions and answers, JavaScript questions pdf, JavaScript question bank, JavaScript questions and answers pdf, mcq on JavaScript pdf, JavaScript questions and solutions, JavaScript mcq Test , Interview JavaScript questions, JavaScript Questions for Interview, JavaScript MCQ (Multiple Choice Questions)
